Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on orchestrate and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe changing nature of engineering has induced m all studies on the relation between engineering and political science or formational coordinate to be more particular proposition . As engineering science evolves from one take of sophistication to a higher(prenominal) level , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and erratum to the environment infragoes changes . It withal follows naturally that much(prenominal) wide-ranging changes atomic heel 18 bound to be reflected in the organization complex body part also . The question here is - to what extent does engineering call for or determine organization body structu re ? The three studies under devotion take radically different stands on the emersion . age `The Management of Innovation by Burns fink (1961 ) asserts that changing technology and securities industry conditions define the attention system of rules of each organization , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very minimal issuing on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , but combines with opposite contextual dimensions such as size , to exert a notice cast on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in ` regular Accidents , supporting with high-risk Technologies , on the new(prenominal) hand , contends that the posture level of sophistication and complexities in technologies absorb led to a authority in which organization structures , however developed or adapt they may be to the changing technological situations , argon unavailing to cope with or han dle systems with `interactive complexities a! nd confining couplingIn some ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to play in the make of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost unpromptedly determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control out of the hands of military personnels gentleman and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and unfathomable to the intellect of human beings . Pugh however at tributes senior management with separatist capacity to alter the structure of an organization by as much as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations organize be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to instinctive shaping organization structure . It is management that will arrive to understand the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to serve and adapt effectively to changing environments . The human management public mover has to play a decisive and deliberate role in defining and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations taking into consideration not only the technological persuasion but also all other factors that could affect the organization st ructureThe optimal or ideal organization structure fo! r each technology situation could in all possibilities not be the standard or...If you want to get a full essay, play club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper