'Filipino Psychology Essay\r'

'Sikolohiyang Pilipino †The fib of Philippine psychological science The psychological science of, ab bulge, and for the Philippines was innate(p) out of the train to establish a discipline which is reactive to the motivations of the Philippine people. [pic] Generally, to some extent, it had been considered a given until a few years ago that when wholeness talked close to psychology, unitary meant the psychology of Americans. Asiatic psychology had been unrecognized, or at least, unacknowledged worldwide. The Zeitgeist in Asiatic Psychology.\r\nThrough the years, however, at that place was an awakening, a realization, by Asian psychologists that western concepts and theories were irrelevant and inapplicable when applied in the Asian context. They began to question the appropriateness of letting western friendly scientists describe and predict Asian behavior, without servant for the differences between the Asian and western sandwich cultures. Thus was born the ne ed for an Asian psychology, a psychology arising from one’s own experiences. With it, there was a social movement as well by Filipino psychologists of the need to have their own identity.\r\nHistory of Sikolohiyang Pilipino, or the â€Å"Psychology of, more or less, and for the Filipinos” Psychology as an academic discipline in the Philippines started in the early 1900s when the U. S. colonized the country. Scientifically, it was generally viewed as a continuation of the development of psychology in the West. In the early 1970s, however, there came a play point in the lives of Filipinos. It was a period attach by a high degree of nationalism, brought about by the declaration of the Martial Law. It was ironic that the engender of Philippine Psychology was, at that time, a novel Ph. D. graduate of Northwestern University in the U. S.\r\nIt was precisely his Western education that made Sikolohiyang Pilipino founder Virgilio Enriquez realize the need to have a psycho logy based on the experience, ideas, and orientation of the Filipinos. Together with three other colleaguesâ€Prospero Covar (anthropologist), and genus Zeus Salazar (historian), and Alfredo Lagmay (psychologist)â€they helped establish the foundation for a psychology of and for the Filipinos. Enriquez had been a professor of Psychology in the University of the Philippines in Diliman in 1963, but left in 1966 for the U. S. to pursue a Ph. D. in Social Psychology.\r\nFrom there, he watched the disenchantment of untested student activists in the Philippines over the deteriorating political and social conditions of the country. When Enriquez returned to the Philippines in 1971, he embarked on a interrogation study with Lagmay into the historical and cultural roots of Philippine Psychology, which included identifying indigenous concepts and approaches. Four years later, he chaired the first national conference on Filipino Psychology. In this conference, the ideas, concepts, and fo rmulations of Sikolohiyang Pilipino were formally articulated. Sikolohiyang Pilipino in the University of the Philippines.\r\nWhen Enriquez returned from the States, he and a few other colleagues translated foreign articles to Filipino. The students were also powerfully encouraged to write their papers in this lyric instead of in English, which had been (and still is) the medium of assertion in the University. Gradually, more and more members of the faculty were persuade to use the Filipino language in article of belief Introductory Psychology. The main problems they encountered in the use of Filipino in education psychology, especially in its sign years, included the lack of materials written in Filipino and the lack of a technical vocabulary.\r\nThese challenges were solved by translations, compilations of local materials, and choosing the appropriate words from the local dialect. there were times when the technical term was retained when there was no equivalent in Filipino . This did not flirt out because Enriquez realized that the translation failed to express a truly Filipino psychology. Other factors were the difficulty of expressing or explaining some Western concepts and theories in Filipino, the negative reactions of students who sometimes felt that their skill in speaking and piece in Filipino was inadequate, and the students’ lack of fluency in the language.\r\nHowever, there were observable benefits as well brought about by the use of Filipino in teaching psychology. Among other things: • It created better rapport between teacher and students • There was a more relaxed atmosphere in the classroom • The students’ confidence grew in expressing their opinions, thoughts, and actual experiences • A different perspective, which was more Filipino, was introduced into the course • Indigenous concepts were ascertained; and.\r\n• The scope of topics discussed became broader with the addition of inform ation from local materials and experiences. break discussions also became more concrete in copulation to Philippine reality. Psychology became related intimately and importantly to the everyday life of the people. Most importantly, with the birth of Sikolohiyang Pilipino, a psychology with a Filipino orientation was developed. The circumstance of Sikolohiyang Pilipino Now.\r\nSikolohiyang Pilipino detains to thrive, despite the death of Enriquez in the early 90s. Its proponents continue to advocate for a psychology that is truly responsive and reflective to the needs and the unique situation of the Filipino people. For more information about Sikolohiyang Pilipino, read an SP proponent’s paper on Indigenous Filipino Values. Reference: Enriquez, V. (Ed. ). (1990). Indigenous psychology: A obtain of readings. Quezon City: Akademya ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino. Copyright Ma. Aleah Taboclaon.\r\n'