Market Failures & Professional Dilemmas Essay

Based on the Edwards article which market failures or imperfections ar present in the Lobster Thermidor case? And stomach you identify any in your professional life? Based on the Halbert & Ingulli reading (Making An ethical Decision) apply the methods of ethical reasoning to these situations. Two market failures can be observed in the Lobster Thermidor case, a tragedy of ordinary goods and informational deficiencies. foremost of all, the divers have to dive deeper, to the limit of diving safety, since overfishing has made the lobsters grand and to catch the lobster less than 30 meter down is getting harder and harder.This is the really typical case of public goods, where the public resources such as the lobsters chthonian the sea are usually over-consumed by the individuals who try to maximize iodins interest. Deforestation, which has destroyed the entire farming industry and forced Miskitos away to entirely rely on diving, was a nonher tragedy ca employ by the overconsumpt ion of the public goods, forest. Secondly, both the divers and the end-consumers make malign, irrational decisions cause of the lack of information.Divers, who do non recognize the true market toll of lobsters as wellhead as the true price of potential risks, bargain away their goods with weeny danger pay allowances. Also, the consumers, who have no idea about the horrific fishing environment in Honduras, are reluctant to pay more(prenominal) than current prices, formed lower than it should be at the cost of homo lives. The company where I worked prior to school has always tried its outperform to remove any little elements of competition in its area.If there were a small but promising start-up with innovative idea and technology, that company used every means most were legal or grey turn a few were nearly wicked- to get rid of the potential threats. For instance, it cursorily imitates the new technology of the start-up, take out the similar patent, scout the hollow out h uman resources, block off the critical suppliers and seed funds, cut the price of competitive goods to the minimum level, and do hostile M&A. This case besides showed the issues related to public goods and informational deficiencies.The company attempted to minimize the production/ventilation of new technologies, which can be considered as public goods, and the newborn ventures could not protect themselves cause of the limited access to the information. From the utilitarianism perspective, these are reasonable and preferable attempts because the larger number of stakeholders can be satisfied. My company had more than 20,000 employees slice the average start-ups have no more than 100 employees.Considering the families of employees, shareholders, subcontractors, and the related industries, maximising profit of my company could bring higher utilities than the success of small ventures. flat in long-term, my companys decision would not be wrong since the possibility of success of s tart-ups are extremely low compared to the spherical conglomerates. My company, which has the global network, huge infrastructure, and accumulated knowhow can exploit the new technology bring out and thereby encourage the social progress.In contrast, from the deontological view, it was absolutely wrong. My company not only hindered the fair competition but also committed illegal acts. Whether the result proved positive or negative is not primary(prenominal) for the deontologists. Finally, it was not proper when applying the concept of virtue ethics since the motives of the actions of the company was not correct and contributes nearly nothing to the harmonious relationship with the community it belonged.