Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Psychoanalytic Personality Assessment

Psychoanalytic spirit judgework forcet PSY/250 Psychoanalytic constitution Assessment The psychoanalytical hypothesis states that there atomic number 18 inner armys separate than your awareness that come across your behavior. Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler and Carl Jung influenced psychology with their theories making a re all in ally bear-sized impact on psychology. As the writer I impart equal and contrast the theories of these trio gentlemen and decide which of these theories in which I agree and which of these theories I do not agree with.Freuds work is now the roughly recognized and to the highest degree heavily cited in all of psychology and pen in valet de chambreities as healthy. Freud stress on dreams and sex. Dreams according to Freuds psychoanalytic system are said to have two levels of nitty-gritty, pellucid content and possible content. The manifest content is what a individual remembers and consciously considers. The latent content is the und erlying hidden meaning. This is the trademark suppositionlism of the psychoanalytic approach to privateity, in former(a) words what we see on the stand up is yet a interpreter of what really lies underneath. Friedman & amp Schustack 2009) In his scheme libido was the sexual susceptibility that was responsible for psychological tension. Freud retrieved that the principal driving force behind men and womens activities was either suppress or explicit sexuality. Unfulfil guide sexuality led to pathological conditions. In other words that the unconscious mind was the terminus facility for repressed sexual inclinations. (Friedman, Schustack, 2009) Freud also felt up that holiness was ripe an exit and a misleading notion which was an idea that should not be spread to pile, that religion was a drug of the masses.His confidence was fully in the discernments ability to access its unconscious thoughts, thus avoiding twain psychiatric disorder. Freud viewed the unconscio us as a collection of images, thoughts and controls that an soul ref enjoymentd to process, which led to psychiatric problems. (Wikipedia, 2010) On the other hand Jung disagreed on what constituted the unconscious. Jung added to Freuds definition by stating that distrisolelyively individual also possessed a collective unconscious, a group of shared images and archetypes common to all graciouss.Jung was spell-bound with symbols. He argued that there are archetypes among these symbols which relate common pitying heritage, not just individual experiences. (Wikipedia, 2010) Thus each of us has a distinguishableiate of common symbols at heart us. Jungs neo-analytic guess also differed suggesting that libido was a worldwide psychic aptitude that was not sexual in nature. Jung believed that sex amounted to only one of the m whatever things that drive humanitys. More grandly, humans are drive by their contract to achieve individuation, wholeness or full noesis of the self.J ung quite different in his beliefs, suggests that religion was an important place of preventative for the individual as he or she began the process of individuation, exploring and excepting all separate of the self, that religion was a means of communication between all types of raft, be buzz onward although religions differed, the archetypes and symbols re of imported the aforementioned(prenominal). In my opinion Jung was to a great extent mythical. Adler as opposed to Freud and Jung was in a sort of his possess. He believed that people were social creatures, forming goals and striving to meet them.Adler saw aff equal health in terms of having healthy treasures, which affect what goals we find out to achieve. He believed that inferiority complexes affected self esteem and caused a negative result on human health. Adler argued for holism, masculinity and femininity were crucial to understanding human psychology (Friedman, Schustack, 2009). The rely of the self was offse t by social and estimable demands. Adler suggested that social res publica was important to psychology as was the internal realm. That the kinetics of power and earnings extend beyond sexuality, and that gender and politics were important considerations that go beyond libido.As you can see Adler was quite the socialist and realist and emphasized the social occasion of empathy. wizard of the traces that I agree with is the theory that dreams play a part in psychoanalytic genius. I say this because of my own personal relationship with dreams. I believe that dreams are a part of our unconscious mind, either from repressed traumatic experiences, which can contri exactlye to nightmares, night sweats, waking up at all hours of the night, which in turn can cause emotional asymmetry and psychiatric disorders.In the same token, I also believe that daydreaming and grateful dreams can be healthy to ones everyplaceall mental health. some other distinctive that I agree with is th e theory that fireing and childhood phylogenesis plays an even greater role in temper. I believe that from the number you are natural how you are nurtured, loved, and cared for, shapes who you will become as an adult. puerility is the or so precise time in the development puts of the ones character. On the other hand, one of the theories that I disagree with is Freuds libido theory.I speak up that he had a dark deep obsession with sex and over emphasized it, in including it in his theory. I felt he had no basis, no proof, and no real meaning in his conclusion. The only partnership to constitution that I believe sex would have, is if one has been through with(predicate) a traumatic experience such as rape, suffer from sexual identity, a sexual dependency or other sexual crisis, otherwise I feel it has no place in reputation. Freud just put focus oning to a fault lots violence on sex in his theory. Another Freudian theory I disagree with is that religion is just an escape and a misleading notion.I have a strong disenchantment with this, world I am a very ghostlike person. For the most part all nations, all creeds, all walks of flavor on this earth, have some sort of religious views. Religion is taught to us as children and plays a very important role in how we place our values, our m oral exams, our principals, so to exclude religion from psychoanalytic personality is preposterous. Our religion, along with our childhood development circumscribes who we are and who we will become. Religion is the most destructive of all weapons of mass destruction, and yet Freud looks at it so nonchalantly.More people have died in the name of religion that any other causes. I know that my religion weighs heavily on my personality. The louvre stages of Freuds theory are that from age 0-2 (Oral) which is the first stage, the characteristic is the lip sucking, burry and swallowing, the infringe is the weaning away from the mothers breast. This stage sugg ests that the willing personality is preoccupied with oral activities such as eating, smoking, biting nails or drinking. The oral aggressive personality is hostile and verbally ignominious using sassing based aggression.The second stage from age 2-4 (Anal) is the defecating or retaining of feces. The conflict is trough training. The anal personality is stingy, and has a compulsive inclination for order and tidiness. This person is generally stubborn and a perfectionist. The anal expulsive personality has a want of self control, being generally messy and careless. The trinity stage from ages 4-5 (Phallic) is genitals. A boy being Oedipus and a girl Electra, which is a process through which they learn to identify with the same gender parent by playacting as much like that parent as possible.Boys suffer emasculation anxiety by believing that the vex knows that they desire their mothers, and thinking that the founder will castrate him. Girls suffer from penis envy, where she is addicted to her mother but then shifts her attachment once she realizes her mother lacks a penis, she then desires her father but later represses her desire for her father and incorporates the value of her mother and accepts her inferiority. The 4th stage, ages 6-puberty (Latency) is unacceptable sexual desires that whitethorn flow into sports and hobbies, having the same sex friends swear out avoid sexual feelings.This personality is relatively calm. intimate and aggressive behavior is less active. The fifth and utmost stage is the venereal stage and this personality represents maturity, intellectual and artistic creativity. This personality is well familiarized and balanced. Now after all of this, are you positive(p) as well as I am that Freud was way off the charts? Again I say that he put much too much emphasis on sex. Freud believed and developed a series of disproof force mechanisms and all of his falsifying mechanisms shared two common properties.One in which they a lot appeared unconsciously and two they tended to distort, transform, or otherwise falsify reality. One of his defense mechanisms Intellectualization is winning on an objective view question. Suppose a married man learns that his wife has an incurable disease. He tries to learn everything he can about the disease and sermon options and by doing so represses feelings of anxiety, feelings of not being able to do anything to help his wife and any feelings of anger he may be feeling.Focusing on the facts rather than the emotional content of the situation. Freud, Jung and Adler each had their own ideas when it came to psychoanalytic personality, though they did not agree on all aspects of each others ideas, combined they were the founding fathers of psychoanalytic personality and are still highly regarded in the scope of psychology today. Their theories combined open(a) doors into the vastness and complexity of the human mind. I believe in the field of psychology a piffling of each of their theories are being honorable today. at that place is a little Jung, Adler and Freud in each of us as we try and draw the human mind and human behavior. References Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2001). Sigmund Freud. Retrieved from http//www. iep. utm. edu Friedman, H. S. , & Schuustack, M. W. (2009). Personality unsullied Theories and Modern Research (4th ed. ). Pearson Education, Inc.. Boeree, G. C. (1997,2006). Alfred Adler. Retrieved from http//webspace. ship. edu/cgboer/adler/htmlPsychoanalytic Personality AssessmentEach individual is distinguished by their own droll personality. Personality is developed in different stages of a person look. There are several theorists who have tried to draw the different types of personalities and determine the meaning of each. Freud, Jung, and Adler were known as sterling psychologists. Although they were sterling their views on psychology varied. To compare and contrast their psychoanalysis theories, Freud, Jung , and Adler perspectives on personality was similar but dissimilar at times. This assessment will compare and contrast psychoanalytic theories of Freud, Jung, and Adler.The assessment will also justify the two characteristics in which I agree and disagree. This assessment will describe the stages of Freuds theory and explain characteristics of personality using these components. This assessment will conclude by describing the use of at least three Freudian defense mechanisms with real life examples. The theories Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, and Carl Jung shared is called psychoanalytic theories. These great men main theory was to decipher human behavior. They focused on some aspects of understanding of psychology.Their main focus was to discover a persons previous childhood experiences and decipher the color a male of female would view a legitimate experience. Freud established the theory that focused on psychosexual progress. Adler established human psychology. Jung established the analytical part of psychology. Freud psychoanalytical insight was broken brush up using three characteristics Id, ego, and superego (Friedman, Schustack, 2012). Freud describes Id as the foundation of personality. Id is demonstrated as not being affected by the external world (Friedman, Schusstack, 2012). The id hold the main physic force and motivations, whichreferent urges or feelings.The second characteristic Freud describes is ego. egotism demonstrates an individual actually having to with the external world. A person ego is controlled by real life encounters for example, going work, taking care of the children, socializing, and running insouciant errands. Freud believes that a person ego reflects reality principles, which are real life situations. Carl Jung believes that ego is the facet of an individuals personality. Jung also believes the ego personality is a conscious action of self control. The third characteristic that Freud demonstrates is superego.Superego is the characteristic that joins moral values and society values. Moral values are taught by our parent who allows a person to know right from wrong. Society morals influence an individual personality by the environment that they live among. Superego is a person conscience that telling them from within what ethical decision or action you need to make (Friedman, Schustack, 2012). Carl G. Jung comes from a family line of ministers on both his mother and father side. Jung theories regarding personality was peculiar and somewhat different. Jung personality theories populate of a persons thought and childhood encounters.His focal point was less on sexuality, and more on historical, spiritual, and supernatural occurrences than Freuds psychoanalytic psychology (Friedman, Schusstack, 2012). Jung analytic psychology was geared toward three component of the mind the conscious ego, the personal unconscious, and the collective unconscious. Jung theory on ego did match to Freuds theory on ego. He bel ieved that a persons ego was conscious personified by the self motivation. Jung also believed that an individual develops this personality at four years of age (Friedman, Schustack, 2012).Psychoanalytic Personality AssessmentPsychoanalytic Personality Assessment PSY/250 Psychoanalytic Personality Assessment The psychoanalytic theory states that there are inner forces other than your awareness that affect your behavior. Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler and Carl Jung influenced psychology with their theories making a very large impact on psychology. As the writer I will compare and contrast the theories of these three gentlemen and decide which of these theories in which I agree and which of these theories I do not agree with.Freuds work is now the most recognized and most heavily cited in all of psychology and referenced in humanistic discipline as well. Freud emphasized on dreams and sexuality. Dreams according to Freuds psychoanalytic theory are said to have two levels of content, mani fest content and latent content. The manifest content is what a person remembers and consciously considers. The latent content is the underlying hidden meaning. This is the trademark idealism of the psychoanalytic approach to personality, in other words what we see on the surface is only a part of what really lies underneath. Friedman & Schustack 2009) In his theory libido was the sexual energy that was responsible for psychological tension. Freud believed that the principal driving force behind men and womens activities was either repressed or expressed sexuality. Unfulfilled sexuality led to pathological conditions. In other words that the unconscious was the storage facility for repressed sexual desires. (Friedman, Schustack, 2009) Freud also felt that religion was just an escape and a misleading notion which was an idea that should not be spread to people, that religion was a drug of the masses.His faith was fully in the minds ability to access its unconscious thoughts, thus avoiding any psychiatric disorder. Freud viewed the unconscious as a collection of images, thoughts and experiences that an individual refused to process, which led to psychiatric problems. (Wikipedia, 2010) On the other hand Jung disagreed on what constituted the unconscious. Jung added to Freuds definition by stating that each individual also possessed a collective unconscious, a group of shared images and archetypes common to all humans.Jung was fascinated with symbols. He argued that there are archetypes among these symbols which relate common human heritage, not just individual experiences. (Wikipedia, 2010) Thus each of us has a set of common symbols within us. Jungs neo-analytic theory also differed suggesting that libido was a general psychic energy that was not sexual in nature. Jung believed that sex amounted to only one of the many things that drive humans. More importantly, humans are driven by their need to achieve individuation, wholeness or full knowledge of the self. Jung quite different in his beliefs, suggests that religion was an important place of safety for the individual as he or she began the process of individuation, exploring and excepting all parts of the self, that religion was a means of communication between all types of people, because although religions differed, the archetypes and symbols remained the same. In my opinion Jung was more mythical. Adler as opposed to Freud and Jung was in a class of his own. He believed that people were social creatures, forming goals and striving to meet them.Adler saw mental health in terms of having healthy values, which affect what goals we try to achieve. He believed that inferiority complexes affected self esteem and caused a negative effect on human health. Adler argued for holism, masculinity and femininity were crucial to understanding human psychology (Friedman, Schustack, 2009). The desire of the self was offset by social and ethical demands. Adler suggested that social realm was importan t to psychology as was the internal realm. That the dynamics of power and compensation extend beyond sexuality, and that gender and politics were important considerations that go beyond libido.As you can see Adler was quite the socialist and realist and emphasized the role of empathy. One of the characteristics that I agree with is the theory that dreams play a part in psychoanalytic personality. I say this because of my own personal relationship with dreams. I believe that dreams are a part of our unconscious mind, either from repressed traumatic experiences, which can contribute to nightmares, night sweats, waking up at all hours of the night, which in turn can cause emotional instability and psychiatric disorders.In the same token, I also believe that daydreaming and pleasant dreams can be healthy to ones overall mental health. Another characteristic that I agree with is the theory that parenting and childhood development plays an even greater role in personality. I believe that from the moment you are born how you are nurtured, loved, and cared for, shapes who you will become as an adult. Childhood is the most critical time in the development stages of the ones personality. On the other hand, one of the theories that I disagree with is Freuds libido theory.I think that he had a dark deep obsession with sex and over emphasized it, in including it in his theory. I felt he had no basis, no proof, and no real meaning in his conclusion. The only connection to personality that I believe sex would have, is if one has been through a traumatic experience such as rape, suffer from sexual identity, a sexual addiction or other sexual crisis, otherwise I feel it has no place in personality. Freud just put way too much emphasis on sex in his theory. Another Freudian theory I disagree with is that religion is just an escape and a misleading notion.I have a strong disenchantment with this, being I am a very religious person. For the most part all nations, all creeds, all walks of life on this earth, have some sort of religious views. Religion is taught to us as children and plays a very important role in how we place our values, our morals, our principals, so to exclude religion from psychoanalytic personality is preposterous. Our religion, along with our childhood development determines who we are and who we will become. Religion is the most destructive of all weapons of mass destruction, and yet Freud looks at it so nonchalantly.More people have died in the name of religion that any other causes. I know that my religion weighs heavily on my personality. The five stages of Freuds theory are that from age 0-2 (Oral) which is the first stage, the characteristic is the mouth sucking, biting and swallowing, the conflict is the weaning away from the mothers breast. This stage suggests that the willing personality is preoccupied with oral activities such as eating, smoking, biting nails or drinking. The oral aggressive personality is hostile and verbally abusive using mouth based aggression.The second stage from age 2-4 (Anal) is the defecating or retaining of feces. The conflict is toilet training. The anal personality is stingy, and has a compulsive desire for order and tidiness. This person is generally stubborn and a perfectionist. The anal expulsive personality has a lack of self control, being generally messy and careless. The third stage from ages 4-5 (Phallic) is genitals. A boy being Oedipus and a girl Electra, which is a process through which they learn to identify with the same gender parent by acting as much like that parent as possible.Boys suffer castration anxiety by believing that the father knows that they desire their mothers, and thinking that the father will castrate him. Girls suffer from penis envy, where she is attached to her mother but then shifts her attachment once she realizes her mother lacks a penis, she then desires her father but later represses her desire for her father and incorporates the value of her mother and accepts her inferiority. The fourth stage, ages 6-puberty (Latency) is unacceptable sexual desires that may flow into sports and hobbies, having the same sex friends help avoid sexual feelings.This personality is relatively calm. Sexual and aggressive behavior is less active. The fifth and last stage is the Genital stage and this personality represents maturity, intellectual and artistic creativity. This personality is well adjusted and balanced. Now after all of this, are you convinced as well as I am that Freud was way off the charts? Again I say that he put much too much emphasis on sex. Freud believed and developed a series of defense mechanisms and all of his defense mechanisms shared two common properties.One in which they often appeared unconsciously and two they tended to distort, transform, or otherwise falsify reality. One of his defense mechanisms Intellectualization is taking on an objective viewpoint. Suppose a husband learns that his wife has an incurab le disease. He tries to learn everything he can about the disease and treatment options and by doing so represses feelings of anxiety, feelings of not being able to do anything to help his wife and any feelings of anger he may be feeling.Focusing on the facts rather than the emotional content of the situation. Freud, Jung and Adler each had their own ideas when it came to psychoanalytic personality, though they did not agree on all aspects of each others ideas, combined they were the founding fathers of psychoanalytic personality and are still highly regarded in the field of psychology today. Their theories combined opened doors into the vastness and complexity of the human mind. I believe in the field of psychology a little of each of their theories are being practiced today.There is a little Jung, Adler and Freud in each of us as we try and decipher the human mind and human behavior. References Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2001). Sigmund Freud. Retrieved from http//www. i ep. utm. edu Friedman, H. S. , & Schuustack, M. W. (2009). Personality Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed. ). Pearson Education, Inc.. Boeree, G. C. (1997,2006). Alfred Adler. Retrieved from http//webspace. ship. edu/cgboer/adler/html

No comments:

Post a Comment